Lil Durk likes to use social media to relay messages like this.
"I can drop this single and f*ck up the streets on god your release date ain't safe son son," Durk typed.
However, he doesn't like when the blogs take his bait and make it into their bait.
"If I don't say it out loud it's not real stop click baiting smurk back to album," he typed.
Is Smurk correct to suggest that he is the sole owner of his own bait?
Or does an artist's bait become free game for blogs and news sites to turn into their clickbait once the artist releases said bait into the wild?
Discuss
News
Here's Why Kendrick Lamar Might Be Holding Off On Dissing Drake / News
News
NBA YoungBoy May Be Booted From Utah / News
News
Sexyy Red's Family Is Not Happy That's she's Left Them In The Hood / News
News
Rick Ross Responds To Rumor That Drake Owns A Piece Of him / News
News
Rick Ross Says He Has Proof That Drake Got A Nose Job / News
News
Teyana Taylor Is The Latest To Make Her Ass Jiggle / News